Imagine a scenario that plays out across our continent every single semester. Three brilliant minds meet at an academic symposium: a quantum physicist from Munich, an AI engineer from Prague, and a biotechnology researcher from Paris. Inspired by a shared vision and a breakthrough discovery, they decide to skip the traditional corporate track. They turn down lucrative offers from American technology giants and commit to building a deep-tech startup together, right here in Europe. They have the expertise, the drive, and a unique innovation born from years of rigorous research.

But almost immediately, the geography lesson begins.

They realize that simply building a product is far from enough; first, they need to navigate a legal labyrinth. Where do they incorporate? If they choose Germany, the French co-founder faces a mountain of cross-border compliance. If they set up in France, their Czech seed investor scratches its head over local governance norms. And to offer meaningful Employee Stock Options (ESOPs) to a brilliant early hire based in Poland, they must navigate a completely separate, highly punitive tax regime. Before they have even shipped a single line of code, validated a prototype, or spoken to an actual customer, they are already paying a heavy structural tax.

This is the reality of the European tech ecosystem. European founders do not lose to their American or Asian competitors because of inferior science or a lack of ambition. They lose because our legal and technological environment remains fragmented. Universities, investors, and entrepreneurs are structurally discouraged from speaking the same operational language. We do not function as a single market; instead, we operate as a collection of isolated islands, separated by invisible administrative walls.

The tragic irony is that we already possess the core ingredients required for global dominance. We have the raw talent, we have the ideas, and we increasingly have the capital, exemplified by institutional steps like the EU’s new €5 billion growth fund. Yet, because we lack a shared vision, our potential remains buried under piles of bureaucracy.

The Hidden Gold

The undiscovered gold of Europe’s economic future lies in deep-tech: scientific innovations forged at our universities. Institutions like ETH Zurich, TU Munich, Imperial College, and CTU Prague produce research that rivals many inventions coming out of MIT or Stanford. In specific segments, our smaller regional ecosystems possess an undeniable unfair advantage. Take Munich, for example, which has quietly become a world-class powerhouse for robotics and hardware engineering thanks to its proximity to industrial giants such as BMW and Rheinmetall.

In Silicon Valley, density is absolute. Customers, startups, investors, institutional know-how, and elite talent all sit within a 50-mile radius, operating under one legal framework, one currency, and one cultural attitude toward risk. In Europe, we actually have that same density of excellence, but it is distributed across thousands of kilometers and fragmented by borders. We have the robotics expertise in Munich, the AI talent in Paris, and the software execution in Prague, but we lack the connective tissue to let them grow together.

Because deep-tech innovations require profound scientific expertise and capital-intensive development cycles, the friction caused by European fragmentation hits them first and hurts them most. 

Consider how the engine stalls at the commercialization stage:

  • Missing Spinout Standards: We need a clear, motivating model for European universities to cooperate on spinning out new inventions. Instead of working in isolation, we must learn from the best and apply those lessons across Europe. This means creating Europe-wide spinout standards inspired by top institutions like ETH Zurich and widely respected by founders, investors, and academia.
  • The ESOP Problem: To keep top talent, startups need to give employees shares in the company. However, trying to set up employee stock options across European borders is an administrative nightmare. It frequently creates unfair tax bills, forcing employees to pay taxes on shares they own but cannot sell.
  • Scattered Investor Rules: When a startup in Munich looks for funding, it might talk to investors from France, Czechia, and Germany. Because each country uses completely different approaches to risk, valuation, and cross-border governance, raising money often turns into a slow uphill battle instead of a quick cash injection.

Beyond hurting founders, this fragmentation also weakens our capital markets. Institutional backers and family offices willing to back European deep tech frequently hesitate, not because of the startup’s performance, but because of legal complexity. Managing a pan-European fund structured as a Luxembourg SCSp and navigating marketing rules across a dozen distinct member states shouldn't be the norm, yet today, it is the only path available.

Building the Bridge

We can no longer afford to rely on clever legal workarounds to build global companies. We need structural solutions.

To bridge these gaps in the interim, the startup community has had to build its own relational connective tissue. Through initiatives like the Founders Force community, I have deliberately tried to construct that missing pan-European network by bringing together 130+ accomplished founders across 26 countries to co-invest, share know-how, and to open doors to early customers. It works, but it works despite the existing infrastructure, not because of it. Community can partly compensate for the unity Europe lacks, but it cannot replace formal legal harmony.

To scale this across the continent, we must champion radical, systemic solutions. Chief among these is the creation of a true EU Inc structure, a single, unified company registration valid in all EU member states, which high-growth startups urgently need.

While the European Commission has begun to acknowledge many of these issues, the current proposals on the table are simply not sufficient. We do not need incremental tweaks or polite guidelines that member states can choose to ignore. We need a comprehensive, legislative breakthrough that allows a company registered under an EU Inc framework to hire, grant equity, and attract capital across all member states with zero friction.

Simultaneously, we must fiercely support the development of sovereign European technology infrastructure. We cannot build a dominant digital economy if our entire ecosystem relies on foreign layers of cloud services, data infrastructure, and digital tools. Eurostack’s pursuit of a unified European digital stack is exactly the type of continental ambition we need to pair with corporate legal reform. But such an idea does not come cheap. To achieve it, we need to activate hundreds of billions of euros lying dormant in the European pension fund system and allocate that capital to startups.

Europe is facing a decisive choice. We can continue to act as a fragmented launchpad, watching our finest scientific minds export their potential to unified foreign markets, or we can finally build a continent where innovation can stay, grow, and lead. The talent is already here. The ideas are flowing. The capital is waiting. Now, we must build a shared ecosystem that lets trust and innovation travel freely.

Share